Child Support/Benefits Of Private Agreements Outside Court System
Pamela has been divorced for some time, but continues to receive child support payments. These child support payments were negotiated, additional support beyond any legal obligation under statutory requirements. Pamela forfeited community property interests at time of divorce in exchange for increased child support. It should be a plan that works; it’s based on written agreements and obligations. However, this is her 2nd time back in court to enforce payment. Husband has a difficult relationship with the children, and when he gets really stuck, doesn’t know how to move himself out of the mess that he has completely and entirely created with his children. He panics and refuses to pay the agreed upon child support, his only leverage. Wife is now forced to go back to court to enforce judgment. Even though a court order from the original settlement dictates the terms, the court continues to accommodate husband. It is probably personal for this judge at this juncture; there is some intangible that results in the court continuing to accede to something the husband requests. Given this judge’s predisposition, a private settlement might benefit even if wife has to give up a small amount of entitled support.
Caveat: be cautious of the court system, especially if there is substantial money involved, and pursue private settlement. However, the professionals you employ and the method you choose in a private settlement is critical, it determines outcome.
For more information on this subject, see Calculating Child Support in California.
My goal is to support you in achieving a result that is favorable and fair to you.